Iron can be heated and poured, molten, into molds of almost any conceivable shape. For the better part of a century objects created in foundries and pieced together by human hands dominated our lives. Iron was the medium of the industrial revolution but wood was it's fuel. The world was conquered with iron and fire. Trees were the first victims of the holocaust that ensued. The hunger for dried tree flesh was rivaled only by the madness for metal. First, sharpened metal in the form of edged weaponry, then metal slugs and metal jackets - high speed projectiles and the containers of fire. He who had the most metal won most disputes and though there were other factors, it's always come down to he who wields the most fire, the best fire, the most spectacularly accurate fire. If Prometheus only knew. All of history seems predicated on the refinement of fire delivery and containment. Burning is the epitome of violence and the father of it. We burn to extract and forge and shape and hurl. To move things fast you need to burn something somewhere along the line. Fire is our god; or not. But fire is the king. He keeps his subjects safe and warm.
An object, made from fire and iron, becomes a container for a smaller and more controlled fire, a personal fire, a pet fire, a fire that eats trees and heats soup. A stove is a fire box and this one, the Victoria, wastes away now in a cabin in rural Georgia. To contain heat, to direct it and disperse it evenly, is a principle that has given us much in the way of comfort and convenience. But those benefits are short-lived; and short-sighted. We now understand better the value of trees, and the harmful effects of smoke. This stove, therefore, is a symbol of arrogance and greed. It is represents consumerism, the disposable society and a transition in lifestyle. If we're no longer tied to the land, why would we expect people to care for it?
This is just a stove. The women who worked here were only trying to live better lives, more productive lives - easier lives. They burned wood because there was an endless supply of it and burning wood was all they ever knew or could foresee. Someone once was very proud to stand before this stove. Someone thought it was beautiful. This stove saved some woman from a life of perpetual toil above an outdoor pit. It helped feed people, this blue stove, and it helped to keep them warm. A family. Maybe a whole generation grew up around this stove. Nobody knew about climate change back then. Nobody could conceive of a hydrogen bomb. They didn't understand mass extinctions or Kalashnikov rifles. Iron and fire were good things, signs of progress, the ease of hardships, the end of suffering, answers to prayers. All the objects in this photograph - the window, the mirror the planks of the walls, all of these things were achieved because we learned how to control fire, to manage heat and flame. And what of the light that shines through this window to illuminate the stove? Fire. The light of a fire 93 million miles away. We owe the very fact that we see to fire. Our greatest evolutionary advancement, our greatest gift - vision, sight - the thing that makes what our brains think of possible. All the result of a very distant, and dying, flame.
o O o
About Vincent
Connections
View all »
Causes Vincent Carrella Supports
ACLU, SPCA













wood and fire
My aunt in Colorado opened a drive-in restaurant in the 1930s so her children would have jobs. She cooked the barbecue sauce and roasted the meat for the restaurant in an iron wood-burning stove. When it deteriorated she replaced it with another wood-burning stove.
We have so much knowledge in hindsight, but cannot expect to make decisions except guided by what we judge as good today.
The poor world has to muddle through with less than complete understanding of the effect of many actions that seem harmless now. Don't see that it is going to change.
But Why?
But why don't we see that? Why don't we learn? Why *are* we, by nature it seems, so short-sighted, like the grasshopper who watches the ant? I blame the Enlightenment. : )
But you're right. It won't change. Yet is our ignorance a valid excuse?
Ignorance?
is our ignorance a valid excuse?
Just one little thought-- Experts.
My husband did consulting at JPL in Pasadena. On one assignment he wrote computer programs to assisted two experts to gather data for their theories.
One man believed the earth's core was cooling. The other believed it was heating up.
If experts --no matter the field--do not agree, how does the ordinary man know which direction to take? Is it ignorance or lack of omniscience?
Ignorance
I don't know. But I don't believe we're ignorant. I think we have a compass-like sense of the truth and an innate knowledge of all we need to know. I read Einstein's bio recently. Excellent book. He was a great, brilliant man. But as he grew older he also grew more intractable, sticking to his beliefs doggedly in spite of new developments and data regarding gravity and light. He missed a huge opportunty to contribute to what was going on later in his life due to his stubborness and refusal to see things in new ways.
Our egos, our pride. They are forces that rear up against us, over and over again. The answer in my opinion is humility and God.
How does the ordinary man know which direction to take? He doesn't. Never with clarity, with surety. But he will be shown, when the time is right, if he is truly paying attention and listening. When he turns himself outward instead of in.
hope
he will be shown, when the time is right, if he is truly paying attention and listening.
What a splendid hopefilled statement.
Thank you, Vincent.