where the writers are
Plunder Blog! Obama is to Western style Capitalism what Gorbachev was to Soviet style Socialism

In attending a seminar on the BRICS economies in Providence and in finding almost everybody (with a few very good exceptions) completely imbedded in what is already a completely obsolete mode of thought, it became quite clear to me that almost exacty twenty years after the final fall of Soviet Style socialism we are getting to the final collapse of U.S. Western style capitalism. Of course there are differences but also incredibly interesting analogies that we should acknowledge overcoming a diffused state of denial. Analogies in leadership to begin with. Gorbachev was the best leader that the rotten soviet system could produce in the desperate attempt to save itself from its deserved fate. Obama is the best leader that the West could produce in its own desperate attempt going on these days. Nobody during the final desperate struggle of Gorbachev would have really thought that the Soviet monster would really collapse. But it actually happened, very suddenly and very fast Gorbachev was just an impotent man. No individual alone can change the social forces of history.  The Soviet situation could not be cured. Today nobody really suggest that THIS MODEL OF DEVELOPMENT IS OVER. Most of the people, including most of today's speakers at this seminar, distinguished economists and political scientists, do think that this crisis is going to finish, just another cyclical one. City group and other plunderers really think can get away with it perhaps lobbying for the insane idea to create "bad banks". And poor Obama, himself an impotent man does whatever he is allowed to do to try to get over the crisis. But as Gorbachev he will have to give it up at some point and acknowledge that the game is over.

Sure, there is going to be some suffering but will not be the end of the world. Actually will only be the well deserved end of an immoral system of exploitation as corrupt as the Soviet was that it is simply too late to rescue. The question then will be:what's next? And there is where we need to be present.... 

 

Comments
1 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

US(SR)

As usual, your analysis is acute and interesting.

 "What's next" is not only THE question, but also, I think, something that well summarizes the main difference with the past. After the fall of the Soviet Style socialism the answer was quite obvious because the system collapsed losing the confrontation with the opposite model. The alternative was there.

Today, on the other hand, there is not such an opposite (indeed, it would be a 'third opposite'!):this model of development is imploding without the 'help' of any confrontation simply because is not sustainable.

So, how to deal with the fact that today we have some variations, but only one theme? Of course, we cannot 'choose' now. Rather, as you suggest, we should be present and 'create' a new order.

In so doing, we should bear in mind something: since we have just found out that the 'almighty natural selection' doesn't work without 'difference', in the future we should abandon the 'let things happen' approach. The price of uniformity is that you have to constantly improve without confrontation: it's hard because you have ALWAYS to be present.