where the writers are
Obama and the dangers of football

Barack Obama – a Red Room member, by the way – has expressed concern about the damage football causes to its participants. If the violence in the game is reduced, thus also reducing the damage to bodies and brains, then ``those of us who are fans maybe won't have to examine our consciences quite as much,'' he said.

Scott Ostler, the fine columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle, yesterday spoke with some of the San Francisco 49ers about the president's comments. The response he got is amazing, but not surprising, Ostler says, for men who earn their living playing the game.

Most said their kids could play at any age; several said they might even encourage their sons to play as pre-teens, despite the overwhelming evidence of the chance of brain damage to kids. Coach Jim Harbaugh said when his 4-month-old son was able to play, he might do better if statements such as Obama's discouraged competition from other youngsters.

One player said he wanted his son to be ``a man'' at age 8. Difficult for a kid to make a wise decision about his brain at age 8, one would think.

Fortunately, not all players feel this way. Terry Bradshaw, now retied but once a great player for the Pittsburgh Steelers, came out last year saying if he had young sons he would discourage them from playing until at least high school, and he'd think about it then.

Several other retired and prominent players have said similar things, perhaps thankful that they can still think through such issues.

But for these other players with the 49ers – well, Shakespeare said conscience doth make cowards of us all. They don't want to be looked on as cowards, that's understandable.  But when you're talking about possible brain damage to kids?. . .

Scott Ostler's column:

http://www.sfgate.com/49ers/ostler/article/Let-the-children-play-49ers-s...

Comments
2 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

Manly

One of the things I dislike about all sports (tho I like many good things) is the over emphasis on the value of any sport.  Hours spent practicing and driving to distant game sites might better be spent studying.  I would like to see the emphasis on learning math and science to be as important as being  a star football player, for example.  Yet I am sure there are kids who are wired for physical activity; and if they were not involved in sports, they would not be studying but might perhaps be involved in other dangerous or  destructive activities.   I am amazed at the expense (both time and money expense) that parents go to attend the games of their kids' travel teams.  Could that time and money spent by parents be better spent elsewhere? Or are the friendships and fellowship with other families with similar interests of inestimabel value to the family?   These are considerations that parents can make, and they should not be afraid of criticism once they decide what is best for their particular family.    Personally I would prefer having my kids in a worship service on Sunday night as opposed to their watching what I consider just an unimportant game.  Because medical providers and researchers are my heroes, I admire young people involved in serious advanced study more  than kids involved in athletics.  Yet I appreciate the fact that many young athletes star in academics as well as physical skills and they may do so because of the intellecctual benefits of participating in a sport.   Athletics greatly develops brain power, I believe.  Too bad that injuries damage brains.  Let's do what we can to make all sport safer.

Comment Bubble Tip

Sue, I think sports are very important

I wrestled in high school – I've written about it several times on Red Room – and have always enjoyed tennis and golf (I was a golf writer for a period and covered several US Opens). I think sports can certainly help develop character and smarter athletes are usually better athletes. Some very fine writers were athletes. Among those who wrestled are John Irving, David Mamet and Robinson Jeffers. I'm sure there are tons who played football and baseball and basketball. Bobby Jones the golfer was a very graceful writer. But boxing, football and hockey can get in the way of future creative endeavors for athletes if they sustain brain damage and that's certainly the record for boxing and football. The difference is there are many more kids playing football than boxing. In the old days boxers were simply considered punch drunk and generally laughed at and given names such as Slapsie Maxie, even though what people were witnessing were tragic situations, the mental and emotional lives of men cut short. No one today is laughing at Muhammad Ali, or shouldn't be.

We've been warned about football for a long while. Even the 1996 film ``Jerry Maguire''  has a scene in which a journeyman football player is recovering in a hospital from an umpteenth concussion, and the only person who shows concern is the player's young son, more concern than some of the 49ers players voiced for their children yesterday. That's an irony, I guess.