where the writers are
Shakespeare Revealed

Following the seemingly interminable and generally overwrought discussion of who wrote Shakespeare's plays, the answer can now be revealed.

After thirty-some years of intense study of the plays (I have even read most of them), it is clear to me that they must have been written by an actor. And not just any actor, but a professional who trod the boards daily, year after year, and knew in his soul what it is like to have to entertain an SRO audience in midsummer heat.

What is most remarkable in the plays is the language, the incomparable inexplicable power and glory of the verse. But since no one can actually write that well, the language itself cannot be used to determine authorship.

However, what is most revealing in the plays is the extreme focus on character over plot. Plot is the last of this playwright's concern. He steals them from anywhere, and slaps them down without a thought or care about contradictions. He can do this because he knows he can get laughs from a grocery list if he has the character right. This is the mark of an experienced performer.

And where else in the English language have we ever seen such an explosion of character. Take As You Like It (one of my personal favorites). There are maybe a dozen characters in this play that would dominate the stage in any other playwright's work. This is how you keep your company of players happy year after year while traveling the backroads of England. 

So the person who wrote the plays was an actor. And of all the actors suspected of having written Shakespeare's plays, the most likely choice is the one with the same name.

Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare. Q. E. D.

Next time: who is buried in Grant's Tomb.

Comments
4 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

Brilliant, Stephen...

Thanks for this post. For what it's worth, I believe this too. I haven't read all the plays but feel that, in any case, their authorship reveals one talent and one mind, which is what makes them truly incredible.

 Some of his plots are shaky, but the fact that his characters seem to be in a perpetual competition to upstage each other within the scenes - and without damaging the overall drama - makes his work unique and the product of dazzling genius and creative energy. When  you consider, this is no small thing to pull off.

I've never had much time for alternative theories, but I daresay some scholars have got a viable thesis out of 'proving' otherwise and have probably earned a lot of money.

Anyway, it's good to hear your view. My only claim to literary fame is that I was, apparently, due to share Shakespeare's birthday, but made an entrance too early to qualify!

 

 

 

Comment Bubble Tip

Thanks, Rosy

There are mysteries about Shakespeare, but I don't think authorship is one of them!

Comment Bubble Tip

Nicely reasoned, and

worth many points, but I also kind of like the mystery of never knowing.

Sudden thought: when HE wrote in ``Hamlet'' ``To be or not to be,'' was that a camouflaged query about eternal recognition or anonymity for the writer of the plays? The whole speech makes some interesting arguments. And there are all those slings and arrows that keep popping up during the authorship question.

Comment Bubble Tip

It certainly

lends an interesting resonance to the phrase.

I also think it's interesting in this soliloquoy that Hamlet refers to the undiscovered country, from whose bourn no traveller returns when the whole play is premised on the meeting with his Father's ghost. Still pondering that one.