Megamillions
Blog Post by Stephen Evans - Mar.30.2012 - 4:16 pm
Not winning and losing are not the same. Not not losing and winning are not the same.
Not winning and not not losing seem oddly familiar.
Memory in reverse is Imagination.”
—The Magical Dog Who Never Sleeps
About Stephen
Stephen Evans is a playwright and author who came to Maryland for the waters. He was not misinformed.
Connections
Stephen has 6 connections
View all »
View all »
Causes Stephen Evans Supports
Best Friends Animal Society (http://www.bestfriends.org)










re: megamillions
What I do know is that megamillions equals lots of noughts at the end of a number. Others may come to nought but the winner keeps company with a trail of noughts.
Not Not Nought?
Okay, now I'm confused.
Okay, I added the now.
re: the not, naught and nought
The ones who have come to naught are certainly not in the same league as those who have been embraced by a set of numbers accompanied by a retinue of noughts.
For those who did not enter the draw, for them it is not naught but nought.
For those who entered and won, it is a certain figure plus many noughts in tow.
For those who entered and lost their bets, it is naught and nought.
To the rest of us, how naughty and manifold noughty are the hands of Fate and probability!
Is someone being noughty
Is someone being noughty here?
re: noughty
Spick and spank noughty.
re: more noughtiness
Verily, verily, verily
not naughty noughty knot!
Merrily, merrily, merrily
one noughty noughty lot!
not
naught getting it is not a problem but getting it is
Winning and losing
are too often objective criteria we assimilate into our mythology which have no truthful place there and, either way, do not dispose towards genuine happiness.
Oh, come on
It's all for naught.
Cheers