Sherlock Holmes and the Zodiacal Conspiracy
Copyright © 2012 by Klaudio Zic. First published by Klaudio Zic Publications, 2012 http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/astrology The Academic Zodiac is Copyright © 1972 - 2012 by Klaudio Zic. All Rights Reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or otherwise, for commercial purposes or otherwise, without the written permission of the Author. The Academic Zodiac is privately owned © 1972 – 2012 by Klaudio Zic.
Things happen of which one knows nothing about. Is someone hiding them from you? No, they could not know less about anything! What things? Everything! Like when, why and what.
a) Zodiacal conspiracy could not actually happen since there was no zodiac at all. Apart from still glorious attempts from the Chinese, the old Egyptian and shreds of zodiacality as still found through rural Germany, the zodiac was never known, exposed or presented unto humankind at all.
b) Do observatories know zodiac? They don’t. You can live by one, like Sai Baba did, and not know your Sun-sign at all. On November 23rd, the Sun is still in Libra.
c) You can run up to Mill Hill if you happen to be in London, but no one there can tell you anything about zodiac or ascendant sign, not even the Indian population can. Of course, the tiny man in that little “astrology” shop can’t help you: he was just doing what he has been told, just like you. No one checks upon heavens these days. Visibility permitting, one could, but no one dares question superstition.
d) Talented writers who rewrite default mind by copying so that people say: “Ah, yes!” while continuing not to understand – were no astrologers. For an example a talented and also amusing pranksome writer like Aleister Crowley had no idea of the zodiac, ascendant set or consequently the Tarot neither he could afford to adequate initiations that would eventually lead towards magical evocation proper.
e) As concern pseudo-magical superstition, people were at best calling upon completely wrong “good” beings – an optimistic estimation when it comes to zodiacal offset.
f) We often state “upcoming 7” signs of zodiacal offset when stressing the present maximum 6. Thus “7 Up”. Of course, having full 6 signs of zodiacal offset is rare; as 5 is already a horrible feat: in a world where 1 degree of error crushes all calculation.
g) The ascendant offset is even more terrible and unfathomable in a bona-fide mountebank; namely, what is seen as “Capricorn” is Cetus; thus full caveat as concern ascendant estimation: we are talking of personal guardian angel here and there must be no error.
h) The zodiac is of course no ascendant set: the two have a completely separate purpose, philosophy, dynamism and meaning in Astrology.
i) That the masses “believe” that there are 12 ascendants rising at east is precisely first proof that there is no such thing at all. Namely, this “belief” is valid until someone takes a look over one’s balcony. One will find nothing like 12 ascendants out there. A modern Sherlock Holmes would make oneself comfortable, and recline while observing the rising stars: only Holmes had no balconies at disposal, the skies were always partly obscured and Sherlock seldom questioned that kind of superstition at all.
j) No further error must be made in assigning faux or even multiple faux horoscopes to babies who spend their lifetimes never knowing their guardian angel proper.
k) It takes minutes in order to scan and present the zodiac and ascendant set for the current epoch. This is the task of Hayagrivananta or the zodiacal master for the epoch – a special avatar that adjusts the stellar clock in time.