where the writers are
Doctors: the New Priests?

 

First, there were the priests.  Now, there are the doctors.  Has anyone else noticed the similarities between those two?

 

Along with lawyers, they have always formed the most loathed and derided professional triumvirate in literature and the theatre.  Anton Chekhov, himself a physician, said, "Doctors are the same as lawyers; the only difference is that lawyers merely rob you, whereas doctors rob you and kill you too."

 

Anyone who has spent any time in Italy will have come across the numerous witticisms about the Church and its ministers. Boccaccio portrays clerics as lecherous, wealth-chasing gluttons.  In Assisi, gift shops are littered with ceramic figurines of pot-bellied Franciscans and Dominicans downing tankards of beer or stuffing their faces with food.  In Rome, locals will let you in on the fact that the Vatican car number plate S.C.V. (Stato Città del Vaticano = State City of the Vatican) actually stands for Se Cristo Vedesse! (=  If Christ could only see!)

 

An ancient Roman proverb warns that "The doctor is to be feared more than the disease."  In the Commedia dell'Arte, the Plague Doctor is a figure of fun.  Molière, a true life hypochondriac and, therefore, experienced patient, observed that "Doctors pour drugs of which they know little, to cure diseases of which they know less, into patients of whom they know nothing."  Napoleon Bonaparte said, "Doctors will have more lives to answer for in the next world than even we generals."

 

An obvious practice doctors and priests have shared over the centuries, is using multi-syllabic phrases – often in Latin or Greek – to dumbfound and scare into submission ignorant folk in order to cover up their own ignorance or their sometimes their less than altruistic motives.  Both brandish language as a tool of power.  By using terminology the punters do not understand, they place themselves outside the reach of contradiction, and become inaccessible to a fair fight.  It is impossible to challenge someone who is speaking to you in a foreign tongue.  Prior to the Reformation, when mass was exclusively in Latin, hoards of people said "Amen" to precepts they did not actually understand.  Just as billions of people now swallow tons of tablets without knowing what they are actually made of.  It is what we call an act of faith, "faith" being also something we are supposed to have in our doctors.

 

Both medicine and the priesthood are professions whose authority has always been feared for the power it possesses over us (the priest, over our souls; the doctor, over our bodies), rather than genuinely respected.  Both demand that their orders ("doctor's 'orders'", like in the military) be obeyed to the letter, without deviation or questioning, on pain of losing that without which you could not be human – your soul or your body.  How many times have we heard people say, "The doctor says I can't"? Millennia of Greek philosophy, Latin thinkers, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the Sturm und Drang and Darwin, and we still lack the most essential of freedoms – the freedom of thought.  Instead, we delegate the responsibility for our thinking to others.  "The doctor say I can't" instead of "I can't because it make sense to me that I shouldn't."  

 

Doctors enjoy their authority because we concede it to them so readily.  That is evident by the ruffled and peeved reaction you get from a doctor when you query or contradict him or her.  They are clearly not used to being queried or contradicted, and the shock of it puzzles and disconcerts them.

 

Both professions have a strict hierarchy.  Wherever they go, the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury are accompanied by a retinue.  When visiting the hospital wards, the Consultant travels with a court of junior doctors ready to push you back if you attempt to address the Consultant directly.

 

As children, we were told by vicars, priests and nuns to be as good as the Child Jesus.  The same vicars, priests and nuns told us that Jesus was the Son of God.  I figured that, my father being a man, I lacked that inborn advantage, that head start to be as good as the Child Jesus.  So how could I possibly even try? As young child, I asked the school chaplain.  He frowned and said faith was a mystery.

 

As an adult, I asked several doctors why a part of my body was engaged in sabotage activity.  They frowned and said, "It's difficult to explain."

 

Pascal was unequivocal: "Ce qui se conçoit bien s'énonce clairement".  In other words, if it is clear in your mind, then you can explain it clearly.

 

The last thing I wish, is to offend in any way all those who owe their health and even their lives to a doctor.  I respect their choice and their experience.  I, on the other hand, am alive and in relatively good health in spite of a few.

 

My principal disagreement with the medical profession is on a matter of focus.  Ashley Montagu phrases it perfectly: "The doctor has been taught to be interested not in health but in disease.  What the public are taught is that health is the cure for disease."

 

The doctor's focus is hardly ever on the building, but on the destroying.  Disinfecting.  Cutting out.  Removing.  Taking out.  Killing.  Not Healing, Building up, Creating, Empowering.  Doctors tell us that we live in a dangerous world where mutant viruses and hostile bacteria are lurking behind every corner, ready to attack us.  They tell us that the organs in our body are time bombs ready to blow us up any minute.  Be afraid.  be very afraid.

 

Another proverb, this time from China: "The superior doctor prevents sickness; the mediocre doctor attends to impending sickness: the inferior doctor treats actual sickness."  It reminds me of a joke on a ceramic plate I once saw in Rome.  "When you're ill, go to the doctor and pay him.  The man needs to make a living.  Then go to the pharmacist and buy medicines.  The man needs to make a living.  Go back home and throw everything away.  You need to stay alive."

 

Some early Protestants denied the existence of Free Will.  Everything was predestined by the Grace of God.  The evils of the world were caused by the Devil.  Doctors have done away with past superstitions, and opened our eyes to the existence of the D.N.A.  So, instead of being preordained, our lives are now genetically predetermined.  The Devil has been usurped by the Genes.  It's not my fault.  It's my genes.

 

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks put it exquisitely on BBC Radio 4's 'Thought for the Day'.  I only wish I could quote him verbatim.  When God told off Adam for eating the apple from the Tree of Knowledge, he delegated his guilt.  "It's my wife's fault.  She gave me the apple."  

Eve promptly passed the buck.  "It's the serpent's fault.  He gave me the apple."

God glared at the serpent.  The poor animal glanced around in vain.  There was no one around for him to blame.

 

Scribe Doll

 

Comments
4 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

Ah, yes.  The blame.  Pushed

Ah, yes.  The blame.  Pushed onto others when big egos can't summon the right medicinal incantation to easily solve the problem.

Years ago, I had some medical issues.  A chronic dry cough, digestive problems, difficulty breathing when exercising, upper right abdomen pain, and terrible edema.

I went to so many doctors--specialists, who were disconnected from communicating with each other--and most of them--when they were unable to offer a clear diagnosis after a single visit--intimated that stress and other issues of "psychological origin" could be the cause.  Basically, they couldn't figure it out, so it must not have been a real medical issue. One specialist looked at my chest X-ray--during the 5 minutes he spent with me--and said it looked perfectly normal.  Disappointed--as usual--I thanked him, and he added, "Yeah.  The spots you see on your X-ray are perfectly normal for someone who smokes."   I'm like:  "Yeah.  Thanks. But I don't smoke."   And I didn't even know where he had gotten such an idea.

Finally, I went to the female GP we were using for our baby, and she looked over the records, did some tests, and over multiple visits with no resolution ended her attempts by humbly saying:  we doctors don't know everything there is to know about the body, so what you're going through might be something that we just aren't able to diagnose yet.  

It felt like she had just let me out of jail.  

Ends up--I've since discovered--that it was a terrible allergies caused by employment in a vet clinic and the beginnings of a failing thyroid which created extreme sensitivity to foods (especially sugar and salt) and dander.  

Like you, I'm also not trying to suggest that doctors don't have their place.  They do.  They have their place.  

But so does the patient.  As owner and occupier of the body in question, the patient should be given every opportunity that makes sense to act as a PARTNER in healing (including not ridiculing a patient's desire to use complementary medicine).   The patient--as seems to be the trend--should certainly not be treated like an incompetent who could not possibly understand the complexities of such matters, and, thus, is a perfect patsy for when a diagnosis eludes.  

Doctors should strive to find the perfect balance between confidence, competence, and a humble acceptance of the finiteness within which they can act as agents in the promotion of human healing.   

If they did, I might go back to using one.

Great post, Katherine.  

 

Comment Bubble Tip

Thank you so much for sharing

Thank you so much for sharing that, Amy.  Don't get me wrong.  I am NOT happy that you should have had such negative experiences with doctors.  However, it makes me feel less lonely in my views.  99% of the people around me do as the doctor says.  I appreciate that my experience has made me a little militant and too phobic of doctors.  However, I just cannot bring myself to trust them automatically, anymore.  I f I ever find one I can, then I'll travel miles to see him/her and hold onto him/her with both hands.

 

Thank you, again.

Comment Bubble Tip

 Katherine,Your post from

 

Katherine,

Your post from 2012 is an illuminating and entertaining pairing of professions significantly impacting our well-being (or ill-being?) and hence  worthy of a spring rebirth here a year later. 

This newly "assigned" pastoral role for doctors is one of many examples in our increasingly secularized culture of people  looking to science rather than faith or religion for "rescue" from our mortal affictions, but  I doubt most physicians are either capable or desirous of fulfilling this new calling (vocation in its classical sense).  First, medical school curriculum typically does not educate aspiring physicians for this role.Moreover, the way medical services are  dispensed to the masses these days on an assembly line, mechanistic if not robotic basis, as opposed to the personal family  physician (admittedly an ideal not always realized in the socalled "good old days"), does NOT lend itself well to this new "expectation" from "medical providers" (the newspeak becoming popular in the U.S.)

My late wife was a career nurse with supervisory  responsibilities in her last years. From what she often told me of  her extensive experience  at a major university medical center, doctors (with rare exceptions)  were mostly in absentia for terminal patients as well as  surviiving relatives in uncertain "recoveries" and  stressful  last hours.  That unenviable task was left to  the attending nurse.

So much for solace in science and  its practicing acolytes!Be well.  Always benefit immeasurably from your insights.

 

 

 

 

Comment Bubble Tip

I can only speak from

I can only speak from personal experience but I have yet to met a nurse who is anything less than helpful, sympathetic, hard working and kind.  I have only good things to say about them and I think it a disgrace that they should not be better paid in the UK.  

Thank you very much for reading and commenting.