where the writers are
Brotherhood is Not So Powerful
bibliomaniac
Amazon.com Amazon.com
Powell's Books Powell's Books

What an interesting Women's History Month. They must have hired a new publicist. It's as if Mad Men's plucky Peggy Olsen took over the account and decided to shake things up.  I don't know how the new branding will play out, but heck, at this point in the war on women, give it a whirl, girl. 
 
No more laser-like, in-depth looks at Planned Parenthood or women's health or the continued assaults on women in the name of budget-slashing.  Hohum.   No more gauzy Ken-Burns-effect stories about famous women. Sigh.  Even the Tiger Moms and Grizzly Mamas thing is so last decade, so kay-pro feminism.
 
They are trying a new direction.  The new plan is to keep the focus on men for Women's History Month, to put a face on misogyny and violence against women, to make individual men the "that's-what-I'm-talking about" cases in point. 
 
Though I was skeptical at first, I for one love what they are doing with the whole Charlie Sheen thing. Even a catfight between Kathy Griffin and Sarah Palin can't break through the wall of Charlie's Sheen. He is an abusive, narcissistic, violent, insane boor who likes to beat the women he loves.  The good news: he promises no more children. 
 
I really expected the daring Charlie Sheen maneuver would have backfired by now. If a woman NPR exec at a Starbucks, idly trash-talking Teabaggers - and she might just have been chai-ist - can get the ax so swiftly wouldn't you think some straight white brotherhood dudes would have already done a face-saving intervention?  "Sorry Charlie, we don't want lunatics with bad taste."
 
It's not even the Ides of March. We'll check the metrics at the end of the month and re-evaluate, but I'm impressed. 

Comments
2 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

Don't Like the New Direction

What I don't understand is why we're giving people such as Charlie Sheen all the free publicity. His attitude seems prevalent in Hollywood to the point where all movies glorify misogyny. Have you run into any movie lately where the woman isn't decapitated, raped, tortured and/or killed, disrespected, treated with contempt, etc? I know that I haven't in the last few years; in fact it appears to be a standard theme now. What people should do for Womens' History Month is make an example of misogynistic treatment toward women by banning the movies where it happens and not give the Charlie Sheens of this world their 15 minutes of fame.

Comment Bubble Tip

*

*