The film Revolutionary Road based on Richard Yates novel is the only masterpiece of American cinema I saw in 2009. The film is about American men giving up their dreams in the 1950s and one woman's refusal to let go of those dreams. Most critics being men fail to look at gender roles in the film and compare this film to The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit failing to see that there is no hero but a heroine April Wheeler. Yates himself said in an interview that he saw in the 1950s many Americans giving in to mindless conformity and security: "Anyway, a great many Americans were deeply disturbed by all that — felt it to be an outright betrayal of our best and bravest revolutionary spirit — and that was the spirit I tried to embody in the character of April Wheeler."
Released December 26, 2009, the film wasn't really seen until 2009. The film is blessed with a wonderful director Sam Mendes who is able to get great performances from his steller cast--Leonardo di Caprio, Kate Winslett, Michael Shannon, Kathy Bates. Winslett was the driving force behind getting this novel made into a film. For years she wanted to star in this film until she finally convinced her director husband Mendes to make it; she said she prepared by reading Betty Friedan's Feminist Mystique classic about 1950s housewives' unhappiness about their lives.
The first ten minutes of the film establish Frank (di Caprio) and April (Winslett) meeting at a downtown New York party and falling in love in the late 1940s--full of promise and life. Then it's the mid-1950s and realtor Kathy Bates shows Frank and April a suburban house in Connecticut which they buy--but the house is on Revolutionary Road named after the American Revolution.
Cinematographer Roger Deakins beautifully captures 1995 with shots of Frank, dressed in suit, hat, and tie, at suburban train station full of identically dressed men. Then Frank is again seen on the train, the streets of New York, and the office elevator always in crowds of identically dressed male conformists. The cinematogrpaher captures the era through a quick series of beautiful shots. Frank deals with his boredom at his white collar sales job with afternoon adultery and martini lunches with his male office mates. These shots are intercut with scenes of April alone in her wooden white suburban house where she seems permeated with loneliness as she puts out the garbage on an abandoned street lined with identical garbage cans. What makes this scene work Winslett's blonde beauty playing off her character's feeling trapped in a life she never wanted.
April plays lead in an play doing an awful job. As she comes to realize her youthful dreams of being an actress at phantasy, the couple has their first blow out fight. Yates' novel and the movie show white middle class America about to give up its revolutionary dreams for post-World War II and settle for security, suburbia, a two-car garage, two children, and a little adultery. Only April refuses, and convinces Frank to chuck his safe job, take the children, and move to Paris--to freedom, to new possibilities, to an unfettered life.
What threatens this dream of freedom is April's getting pregnant with her third child and Frank's being offered a promotion and big raise. She wants to self-abort but her husband tells her that idea sickens him and he wants to take the job. What's fascinating is that it's the woman who feels utterly suffocated in this life she doesn't want. She like Patrick Henry says "liberty or death." After a horrific fight April runs away to stay at night by herself in the woods behind the house. She is a rebel and she is wild. Like all American rebels--Hawthorn, Whitman, Twain all tell their stories-- she runs off to the wild place.
American rebels like April do return home from their time in the wilderness. She returns in the morning like a cheerful robot making her husband eggs for breakfast but she's only wearing a robot mask. Once he's off to work, she takes out the equipment to abort herself. April is like those American revolutionaries in putting her life on the line for her freedom. Nobody--not the husband, not the church, not the state--will tell her what to do. Liberty or death. She dies from the abortion. She is a tragic heroine whose flaws--her inability to see a life without her mediocre husband--lead to hear death.
Unfortunately, Yates lost his nerve in the novel's ending and Mendes follows him showing how the April's tragedy becomes fodder for neighborhood gossip--April's rebellion going nowhere. I would end the film with the daughter hearing her mother's dead. But the ending problem is minor. Both novelist Yates, director Mendes, and actress Winslett make April into an American tragic heroine in this awesome film.
About Julia
Connections
View all »
Causes Julia Stein Supports
Amnesty International
Doctors Without Borders
ACLU
Workman's Circle







Julia, I saw both Ghandi and
Julia,
I saw both Ghandi and this movie. Ghandi was excellent. I agree. And the actor looked like Ghandi. Just associating with Ghandi, I think, elevates audience’s spirit. The movie was awesome.
But I can’t call Revolutionary Road awesome. It was excellent on most of the elements such as actors, setting, timing, and so forth as a film. But I had trouble seeing it as a feminist movie because I consider the word feminist as positive, something to elevate my spirit.
I only saw in the movie two irresponsible, immature behaviors of seemingly a decent couple. The man says to his wife after his extra marital affair, “Don’t you love me? Don’t you care?” He seems as though saying, if she isn’t jealous, she doesn’t love me. Gee, how childish his thinking is. What a cheap way to test her love! With such tacky attitude, mature women lose their respect to such husbands.
So I thought she probably wants to elevate her life from that low level. But the way she tries to solve her problem is to abort her baby by herself and go to Paris without ever preparing for this future plan such as learning French assiduously, saving money for the trip, and improving on her skills to land a job. She only looks at magazine photos of Paris. I thought she should at least look at a classified ads section. I thought if she has enough energy to fight with her husband, why she doesn’t work on her craft as an actress, reading, singing, dancing, whatever she needs. I thought fighting with her husband based on only her frustration, no principle, and making her decision based on no substance doesn’t make her a revolutionary.
So I couldn’t empathize with both characters. I thought of the point of the movie as that: a slice of dark side. To me, without working for it, there is no liberty. Simple. The feminist movement has come a long way because of many women and men sacrificed their time and energy for the principled cause. Liberty doesn’t come free. What do you think of my view point?
Keiko, I generally agree
Keiko, I generally agree with you about the husband in "Revolutionary Road" as his behavior is cheap, tacky etc. But the wife I think is different from your characterization.
She has realized she's an awful actress and has given up that fantasy, so she's smart enough not to study singing, dancing, acting for what she knows is an absurd career choice. She does prepare for Paris and have reasonable plans to make it work--sell the house and use their savings to live in Paris while she gets a job as a secretary for a U.S. government office.
Except she gets pregnant and her husband is offered a raise; besides, he won't let her have a baby in Paris and he attacks her idea of getting an abortion as "sick" so he's not helping her get an illegal abortion with a doctor. Let's say she has no money for even an illegal abortion with a doctor. She hates utterly hates her life and wants a life of freedom. Should she let her husband--tacky, cheap, adulterous--rule her life? No, she won't. There are a lot of women living intolerable lives and having a baby they're aware traps them even more into their intolerable lives. Women in Afghanistan who now live intolerable lives set themselves on fire. It's tragic but setting oneself on fire is a way to protest against the hideousness of one's life.
I think the wife's fatal flaw that leads to her death is her not accepting her husband for who he is--conformist, tacky, adulterous--and leaving him before. She had a fantasy about him still wanting a free life in Paris which he didn't want at all. She still lived partially in fantasy until it was too late and she was trapped, but a lot of us live in our fantasies.
I empathized with the wife and didn't think this a dark movie. The wife was partially flawed but also heroic. I agree with you about feminist movement progressing with women and men sacrificing time and energy for a principled cause and that liberty doesn't come free. The wife sacrificed her life for her liberty. What more could she sacrifice? When men sacrifice their lives for their liberty, we admire it. But what happens when a woman sacrifices her life for her liberty? Why don't we admire that? I think we should.
Fantasy
Fantasy
Yes, I recall a scene in which husband tells friends about wife’s getting a job as a secretary to support the entire family. I felt as though the scene was added almost like an afterthought to make sense because wife showed no effort to land a job before going there. For developing the story, I thought audience needed to see more scenes with details such as learning French, keeping up with typing speed, or writing shorthand on a steno pad and so forth. So, I thought it naïve although that quality made this story.
I thought about this more. In those years, it was maybe possible to land an American job in Paris without being fluent in French. In the 70s especially, I thought native English speakers seemed to think that their language should function anywhere they went. If it didn’t, it wasn’t their fault. That was quite ordinary attitude then. Don’t you agree? For foreigners in the U.S., it’s impossible to get a decent job without putting all the effort to speak English. Thinking further, there are still many English native speakers who follow the past fantasy.
Yes, we all have our own fantasy. And it becomes fatal for the female character. .
You wrote, “When men sacrifice their lives for their liberty, we admire it. But what happens when a woman sacrifice her life for her liberty?” You’re right about that in many stories. I hope more books like them will be translated into English. My heart goes out to those women. But I assure you that Revolutionary Road does not belong to that level. I cannot possibly compare the story with the WWII story by Fujiwara Tei, for instance. It’s so far from it.
Julia, i loved the novel but
Julia, i loved the novel but i must say the movie left me somewhat cold, it lacked the integrity of the writing. i also remember a scene from the novel where april's husband is making a garden path that leads to nowhere and never gets to be complete. i thought it a marvellous metaphor. all in all i adored the book, i found it fascinating and interesting and on a certain level, i admit i could relate. m
Keiko, What is the WWII
Keiko,
What is the WWII story by Fyjiwara Tei? Could you tell me a little bit about that story. Who is Fujiwara Tei?
Fujiwara Tei
Julia,
Internet and blogs are great. I found my comment about Fujiwara Tei on what I wrote to Ellen Sheeley in RR. In my opinion, this is the kind of books should be translated first before the books by Murakami Haruki or Ooe Kenzaburo. It is so powerful that I'm afraid of describing it with cheap words.
http://www.redroom.com/blog/ellen-r-sheeley/what-are-you-reading-right-now
http://openlibrary.org/a/OL1303939A/Fujiwara_Tei