where the writers are
shirley jackson novels versus MFA writing programs
DSC00187-1.JPG

I started an MFA at Columbia this September. I moved from London to New York in August, and was so excited about the whole thing, being in New York, stripping the craft bare &c, that I ran around the house throwing things into boxes and suitcases and some of them were sharp things and lurked on the floor when dropped and i cut one of my heels and left bloody footsteps everywhere, which was very cool (i thought) until I was snapped at for being 'disgusting and unhygienic'. 

When I got here I didn't like it at all, though I tried to. I did try, honest.

It's just that didn't know that many apprentice writers were quite so sociable and organised quite so many readings and things to go to. The classes demanded more writing about writing than I was able to keep up with. Actually I don't know what on earth I'd been expecting. I should have realised that writing programs are for writers with a system, writers who have sufficient self awareness to consistently adapt different literary techniques and styles into their own. Admirable people who can read to a deadline, go to class and make intelligent comments, then go to a reading at a wine bar in the evening and listen to more words. This is not a program for the fellow who hides in bed for as long as possible because sleep is sweeter than life, fortifies herself with green tea at noon and chai in the evening, has very bad dreams whenever she is writing and, despite her best efforts, is unable to organise the jumble that she gratefully puts down when it comes. It is possible that such a fellow would drop out of an MFA because the program holds a mirror to her process and reveals it to be a murky labryinth that can't sustain itself.

O and I didn't know that workshops were such dread. Three hours of it, even. Time yawned. The fellow who comes from bed to workshop can only stammer 'I think this story is existential.' Why do you think that, the workshop leader asks. 'Er...because, it's...well, it's existential.'

I am none too swift. Since September I have been outraged by the expectation that I'm to write and function at the same time. The classes paralyze whatever ideas I have for stories. One class, called 'love, marriage and family in premodern europe', an elective i picked from the history faculty, is the king. We read about Burgundian marriage laws. 'Should a woman want a divorce, let her be smothered in mire.' It gave me ideas that workshop crushed. I've been reluctant to critique the work of the other writers in my workshop because I can't imagine that a writer wouldn't have their own instinct for what wasn't working in their piece. I have glugged furiously from my water bottle when it's time to comment, knowing that I can't laugh manically with a mouthful of water (unless I want to drown), also knowing that I can't be expected to speak if I'm seen to be drinking. It's bothered me that workshop takes the definition of a finished piece away from the person who's written it and puts it in the hands of the people who are critiquing it. Aside from the wonderful writers I've met, my time on the MFA has been a great sorrow to me.

I'd never heard of Shirley Jackson before (please allow me to play the Englishwoman card), but when I came across her novels, We have always lived in the Castle and The Haunting of Hill House on the Barnes and Noble website, I snapped them up, thinking they might help with the new novel I began in the summer (and haven't touched since starting at Columbia) which features a starving girl and a sentient house. I despatched of both in a day, despite lingering over the words to try and make the books last longer. When I came to the end I knew what I had to do to differentiate the four different voices in this novel I'm writing. It was like learning electricity by running along tube train tracks in big rubber boots. I felt the movement in the prose, the unrelenting craft with which Jackson handfeeds the reader darkness. What better way to understand voice than to let the voice of a murderous thirteen year old, or of a thirty four year old poltergeist magnet, crash over you unanalysed? It was like being let into a treasure trove and coming out with my pockets stuffed full of gold secreted there by sprites who knew more than me, anticipated my needs before i did. One day versus four months.

I'm moving to Paris next month, and I'm not sorry at all.

 

 

Comments
8 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

Shirley Jackson, american gothic?

It' wonderful to read about you finding inspriation away from a formalized program. As grad school droput myself, I can sympathize. As far as Shirley goes, "The Lottery" was part of the reading curriculm in my high-school advanced placement program. After reading your essay, I'm tempted to become aquainted with some of her other work. It's really intriguing how one artist, can influence another artist, who in turn influences someone else. It's a never ending chain of creativity and energy. Welcome to the Red Room, and I can't wait to see read more of your writing.

 

Comment Bubble Tip

If a program, any program,

If a program, any program, even Columbia MFA, doesn't encourage you to write, then how successful can it be? Good for you for seeing it so quickly, and thanks for being so vivid about how you got there.

Huntington Sharp

Comment Bubble Tip

the quest for a bamboo tea tray

thankyou all three! and HAPPY NEW YEAR

i wish shirley jackson had written a novel about an MFA program. it would have been a very uneasy read indeed...

Comment Bubble Tip

To MFA or not to MFA?

Thank you for your raw, eloquent candor. I think most writers ask themselves that question, perhaps more than once at different times of life. It takes discipline to devote two years to the craft, and bravery and discipline still to strike out on one's own. Who was it, after all, who said that writing is ultimately "a commitment to being alone in a room"?

Red Room wishes you well in Paris!

Jennifer Massoni, Red Room

Comment Bubble Tip

To MFA or not to MFA?

My best friend is applying to Harvard for a PhD, so now she thinks everyone should go to grad school, and she's on my case. I actually enjoyed college, and the idea of just being able to go to class, read and explore, write and work and create without actually having to go to work or forage for food is pretty alluring. Of course, that wasn't what college was like, as I was 35 when I went and a single parent working three jobs most of the time, but hey, the kids are grown now, so maybe grad school would be different. Maybe.

I had been writing this dance-theatre play, but I got stalled after completing the first draft because I realized I didn't have the chops to really do what I really wanted with it (or maybe the nerve, or the permission), and thought maybe if I got more practice/instruction/jenesaisquoi I would be able to do justice to my project (I teach English Comp at the state college. I was a creative wriitng major in college). The other side of my head just laughs.

So I have been pleased and relieved to get back to writing via nanowrimo 08, and I now have a bouncing baby novel draft, which I am currently procrastinating editing (why I am writing this comment).

 I really feel for your getting more out of reading Shirley Jackson's novels and moving to Paris than an MFA program (I've been thinking about moving to Beirut). I have problems with certain kinds of intellectual masturbation and there is a certain kind of crit... I have no patience for that. I have no interest in showing off or watching other people do it. It just makes me tired.

If I went into a program, I'd need one with a theatre and dance department and performance art and a lot of other things in there. I haven't found one yet. Pus, I want them to pay me. I'm not doing all that work while holding down three jobs again. And it would be nice if it were somewhere warm.

But it's so hard to get anything done out here in the real world. You can't collaborate. Everyone is busy, tired, having a baby, getting an MFA. But you need people to produce a project. It's a challenge.

So I'm going to work on the novel for a while before I go back to the play. The novel has the advantage of being something I can do all by myself, and maybe by the time I get it done, I'll have acquired whatever it takes to go back and kick the ass of that play.

How was Paris?

Comment Bubble Tip

I believe that novels should

I believe that novels should definitely have something more than MFA writing programs because this supposes that you already have some talent and you don't have to pass through all that process.
________

Bulimia treatment

Comment Bubble Tip

yes, perhaps..

...I should have read this before embarking on my own graduate studies in creative writing x

Comment Bubble Tip

Nix the MFA, move to Paris

I find this a refreshing take on something i've been grappling with. I left NY (my hometown) for paris five yrs ago. At the same time, i miss my language and certain things that feed me in NY that i don't get here. On the other hand, i have less distraction and more time to write her because the downtown literary "scene" in NY can be overwhelming and a real time eater. I'd love to know where you are now and how your move worked for you, whether you returned to London or if you're still here in Paris. I also find your rhythm of work very familiar and, yes, writing is very much about the ability to "be alone in a room." Much to my dismay at times, the sunshine out there, today in fact, is ever calling and neglected in favor of work which i sometimes feel will be the death of me.