where the writers are
Puncturing Punctuation

 ? , ; : (...) !  Punctuation marks are to writing what meaningful pauses are to conversation. The comma drama was a yawn that became a sneezing epidemic. In the last couple of days you have been assaulted by the Oxford comma from everywhere. Op-eds in respected journals have quoted from social networking sites where, forget commas, even words are half-chewed to ‘brng on da mt horses’, so to speak.

Therefore, the dirge seems ironic. They have dusted grammar books and are telling us in Moses-like tones that the Oxford comma is a serial comma. My imagination has been running wild ever since as I see a woman (comma does not sound manly enough) wearing an eye-mask, ice pick in hand, going on a murderous spree over lines, slicing them mid-sentence, and killing all ambitions of linguistic rebellion.

The controversy started when some Oxford group announced that there was no need for that comma; it was not meant for the whole world but its muddled academic huddle. People who had no knowledge of that pit-stop between words got agitated. How can you take it away, they asked. In the interest of facts, let me also cite what happens if you desist from the usage of this mark. Should you choose to write, “I ate burgers, fries, and brownies” then you are the Oxford kind. If you write, “I ate burgers, fries and brownies” you are wrong. No, not for eating them, but because you were supposed to add a comely comma before ‘and’. Don’t ask me why. Okay, let me guess: is it to demarcate that the fries are not part of the brownies and the brownies are not mixed in the fries and you have paid for three items and not two?

I love the English language; I love language gliding over tongue and sliding on paper and blinking on monitors. But, I am more than likely to say, “I ate burgers, fries, brownies…” The ‘and’ is an add-on anyway, so a comma with an add-on is just extra cheese.

I do respect technique but not at the expense of a natural flow of words. If there are times I might not be able to communicate adequately, it would be due to the ideas and how they are argued. As I said at the very beginning, punctuation marks are pauses, and pregnant ones at that. Most times, I am in a hurry, my thoughts are rushing past and it would be completely unfair to stop them and give them a dressing down: “Hey, how could you forget to put in that comma there?”

Much of my writing is done without any punctuation marks or as they appear naturally while typing. If after a longish stint with the writing world this does not happen as a matter of course, it might be cause for serious concern. Does it mean there are no bad sentences? Of course there are. I start some with ‘But’, which is not considered quite the right thing to do; others with ‘Because’. I know that there are others words that could easily replace them, but the ‘buts’ and the ‘becauses’ sound right to me; they are sometimes there with a purpose. A style evolves and if writing is as hormonal as it is for me, then I’d be damned to play killjoy and correct fragments. They are meant to be fragments.

My handmaidens are the semi-colon and ellipses. They work best with my writing. And (yes, I also begin sentences with ‘and’) I do hyphenate some terms even though I am told they are considered old-fashioned now.

More importantly, I rarely use the exclamation mark in prose pieces; it is like canned laughter. If some people do not smile back at my smiling words, then they have missed the joke. I haven’t.

Comments
8 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

Commas and Ands

Hi, Farzana. I always thought "and" replaced the comma. But during the editing process with my first series, the Working Man Mysteries, the editor at Penguin Putnam added commas in front of all the "ands" in compliance with their style book. It was a bear doing the corrections, putting in all those commas, so since then I've always put them in.

I agree with you about exclamation marks. I've gotten the impression over the years that exclamation marks are dated. When I need to show excitement or yelling, I use italics.

Comment Bubble Tip

...ands and ands

Hello, Margo:

Publishers do have standard styles and I have no issues with what is deemed proper usage. I just feel that language is evolving and if one chooses to be eclectic in phraseology then these are minor quibbles. The reason I wrote this piece was the huge ruckus created around it. 

As for exclamations marks, I find them being over-used. It is fine in personalised blog posts or comments, though!

~F

Comment Bubble Tip

Loved this “rant” of

Loved this “rant” of yours. Well, not really a rant. But a letting of steam.
~Lynn

Comment Bubble Tip

On rant?

Lynn:

I am constrained to exclaim not once but thrice here!!! 

Since we are discussing language, I am sure you would not mind a bit of pernicketiness, I can say, hand on my heart, this was not a rant or a "rant" - "to speak or shout in an angry way" nor was I letting off steam, for I have no pent-up emotions regarding the comma. It is around, and neither of us has spurned the other or got unduly attached. There are some words that might qualify for such an intense relationship. 

Having said this, I do rant about certain issues and let off steam, sometimes in my poetry. 

But, thank you for reading. 

~F

Comment Bubble Tip

Because

Farzana,

And I would like to add that my mother, the English teacher, taught me the comma after "and" in a list of items was preferred but one would not be counted wrong if they left it out. The same goes for a comma before but, as in the prior sentence but not in this one in which it follows the but.

I found this blog quite enjoyable, Farzana. Mostly because I also start sentences with "and" and "because." (Although usually not "mostly because.")

Take care,
Jules

Comment Bubble Tip

Mostly because

Jules, you had me scratching my head trying to figure out whether I had used "Mostly because"...'Usually', I like. Indians tend to replace it with 'actually', and I am not often a good Indian and I am not into actuals, really. 

It is interesting that words also reveal whether we are visual or aural. I am visual. I go for "Look", "see", "watch" (not to speak of "watch it"!). Other tend to say, "Listen". 

But then, there cna be an overlap when one says, "Look, do you hear me?"

Back to basics and commas, it's good that your mother taught you without making it seem sacrosanct. 

~F

 

Comment Bubble Tip

Love of language and extra cheese

The English teacher within me thoroughly enjoyed this post, and some! Farzana, you have such a way with words, a dry wit, and have perfected the art of keen observation. I share your passion for language, appreciation of the evolution of writing and sense that it is 'hormonal' for you. I also enjoyed your response about the non-rant! With smiles and more smiles. Cindy

Comment Bubble Tip

Hormonal

Thanks, Cindy, but with my hormonal writing, would I not observe only during those periods?! Language, as you know only too well, has untapped possibilities and I just get into droll mode when faced with anything that seems askew or arcane, although I might be the skew one occasionally.

Smiling back. 

~F