Erich Segal made me want to die, and not just any old death but from cancer. I did not know about leukaemia then, it was just cancer with an Oliver by the bedside and a face warm to the touch waiting...just waiting.
Love Story was perhaps more Hallmark card than literature, but I was going through a phase where endings seemed irresistible, at least in print or on the screen. It was pause time from serious works, although the angst had in fact taken birth due to reading all that. In a twist, as much as it was for Segal writing this work as opposed to his academic life, I veered towards Jenny. And when I saw the film, I was taken by surprise because Ali McGraw had hair darker than mine.
It was a tear-jerker and the tears flowed, but some congealed and became that thing you want to be. It sounds completely bizarre for any sane person to be ambitious enough to want to suffer from cancer. Sanity was, of course, not on my mind or in my mind. Sanity was not a dimension I was interested in. This was not even about love, for love would require a man and we were girls and there were boys and boys were stupid and filthy. They did not look like Ryan O’Neil or smell like him. I could smell him by just looking into his eyes – a scent of cool water.
Segal, we are told, was asked to not go headlong into this book as he had a reputation for writing macho stuff. Was it instinct that he had a winner on hand that he pushed aside all sage advice? Was it just the urgency that made him dash off the book at speed and get it over with? Or was it a genuine belief, a part of his thus-far unexpressed side that was waiting to come out?
Erich Segal’s obit pieces have quoted his famous line, “Love means never having to say you're sorry” and also mentioned John Lennon’s riposte, “Love means having to say you’re sorry every 15 minutes.” It must have been an interesting battle. Segal wrote this in 1970, a time when flower power was strong. In that milieu to create love, that too one that got sanctified in a marital union, to show the female character dying and a husband tending to her must have gone against the social structure of creativity.
It worked with the masses. It worked much more than the regular mushy novels. It worked because somewhere, despite all logic, there is something about the starkness of the end embellished along the way with sudden smiles that makes us feel more alive than any living can.
About Farzana
Connections
View all »










I'm a sucker for Love Story,
I'm a sucker for Love Story, too.
I would hope he wrote it just because he wanted to, and because, as a writer, he would write what pressed to be written.
Kristen, I suppose he did. I
Kristen, I suppose he did. I think it bothered others more since he was teaching, and classics at that, to get into this mould.
~F
I watched Love Story ecently
I watched Love Story recently and blogged about it in this blog:
http://www.redroom.com/blog/jessica-barksdale-inclan/watching-love-story
It is SUCH a bad movie (really, the acting!), but it did me in as well. I think we just can't help ourselves!
Best, J Jessica Barksdale Inclan www.jessicabarksdaleinclan.com
Jessica, you really dissed
Jessica, you really dissed it and I loved it (botox, neo Hepburn). I am glad I did not watch it after that flush of late teens (movies did not release immediately in India).
There was a Bollywood remake, too.
I guess we are suckers at some level at some point in time, which is why I don't think I'd watch it now just as I did not watch Oliver's Story. Let the mush remain!
~F
Thanks for bringing back the
Thanks for bringing back the memory f. I too, loved Love Story and to cap it all had a hat like Jennys and a front tooth that grew just like hers!m
Strange, M, but I do not
Strange, M, but I do not remember the details given that I have a hawk-eye! Your hat and front tooth like Jenny's is just such fine ways we relate to 'characters'.
~F
Ummm
I have to take caring issue with the lead-in to your post-- some of us are dealing with that illness and it's a little jarring to read your opening statement. I also have to agree that there's little to commend the story as anything resembling literature; the whole thing to me is unoriginal....yet, I know that the story and film is very affecting. Terms of Endearment has same theme, more depth, intricacy and richness, I feel.
Angelica, I do understand
Angelica, I do understand that for someone dealing with the illness it is no joke, and far be it for me to even think along those lines. However, I would like to state that at the age I read the book, this seemed a romantic notion.
Incidentally, and you might already be aware, a lot of literature even of the nuanced variety does use self-destructiveness as a motif.
My first line, and the rest of what I wrote, was a personal thought and my reaction to a work. It was not generalised.
I agree with you about Terms of Endearment. The idea essentially is how a work affects us, whether or not it has any instrinsic merit that we might critically evaluate when we get over it.
Wishing you well...
~F
I remember it too
I was in my sophomore year in high school, and we argued with our English teacher, Mrs. Gemmill, that it would be a classic. (you know how teenage angst is!) She said we were wrong and that is would be forgotten easily. She was right; we were wrong, but the story (and movie, too) still has the ability to bring me, at least, to tears.
Of course, on the flip side, I remember Ryan O'Neal playing opposite Barbra Streisand in the comedy "What's Up, Doc?" and one of the final lines of the movie by Streisand was "Love means never having to say you're sorry" (batting her eyelashes at O'Neal) and his reply, "that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard" (I may be off a bit on the line here).
It has not been forgotten,
It has not been forgotten, so your teacher was wrong, Nancy. The reason I have pretty much mentioned in the comment to Angelica.
The Streisand-O'Neal conversation about the line is wonderful parody, and if you are off, then you take the credit for it, anyway :)
~F