where the writers are
Publishing Misstep

What a delightful time travel question for a steamy (104 degrees) afternoon in Albany, Georgia,  while I feverishly work on my *next* poetry manuscript (deadline Aug. 1).  The primary misstep that we made , and this was waaay back in 1981 - was . . .

. . . publishing too few copies! That book is now out of print, and I have only two copies.  Honestly, I saw a copy of my first book (it's like this") on sale at e-Bay for $300.00.  If I had been able to afford it, I would have bought it. If i could "do things differently," I would, of course, double the print run and make sure that I had, at all times, at least 50 copies of my book.

2 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

Good Problem to Have

Hello Doris,

Selling out a printing seems like a good problem to have but I can understand how annoying that would be not to have copies of your book to give and sell.

Thanks so much for sharing this memory.

Abraham Mertens, redroom.com

Comment Bubble Tip

publishing misstep

In 2001, knowing absolutely nothing about the publishing industry, I [gasp] self-published my novel, The Bone Weaver. I have no regrets about having done it---there's no better way to learn the ins/outs/ups/downs of marketing and self-promotion---but there was one huge problem. In order to get the books printed in time for several major events, the final edit/proofing was scrapped. Five typos, two historical 'dys-syncronicities'...shameful. Despite excellent reviews, the one that still turns my stomach was a UK reader on amazon who wondered if I had ever heard of using an editor. (I actually met her at an event in London and she apologized...but she wasn't sorry enough to remove the comment!) Fortunately, there was a second printing. Whenever I was signing at a bookstore or event, I'd take along a box of new books. Then, before signing, I'd check the book just purchased. If it was a first printing, it got dumped into the box and replaced by the corrected version.