Queen Elizabeth's thankless poet
Sep 10, 2008, 11:00 GMT
Poet Laureate Andrew Motion says writing for the British royal family is a "thankless" task which is "incredibly difficult".
Andrew won the prestigious post - which sees him write poems to celebrate major state and government events, such as royal birthdays and weddings - nine years ago, but claims it has only served to give him writers' block.
Speaking to an audience at the Ealing Arts Festival in West London, Andrew said: "The job has been incredibly difficult and entirely thankless.
"It has been very, very damaging to my writing. In fact, I dried up completely about five years ago and can't write anything except to commission. I thought the poetry had all gone, but I feel some of it is still there and may yet return.
"Writing for the royals was a hiding to nothing."
The 55-year-old writer also claimed he has no idea whether Queen Elizabeth is happy with his work - which includes a rap-style celebration of Prince William's 21st birthday.
He said: "The queen never gives me an opinion on my work for her. The last thing I did was for her diamond wedding anniversary. I came up with a poem and had to go along to Westminster Abbey. It was read beautifully by Dame Judi Dench.
"Afterwards the queen stopped me and said, 'Thank you.' But I have no idea if she really liked it."
Despite telling Britain's The Daily Mail newspaper he thought the job was a "thankless" task, the poet added the role had some plus points.
He said: "Some of the writing responsibilities are thankless, but there are other things about the post which are extremely valuable - such as the chance it gives to speak up for poetry."
About Dale
Connections
View all »









Motion Sickness
He may think that, she could not possibly comment. She's our Queen and can't voice a public opinion. Imagine the hornet's nest if she could!
Living symbol
Rosy's nailed it: If Mr. Motion wants the official opinion about his poetry, he should ask the relevant minister who actually chose him, or his or her successor. Her Majesty isn't allowed to have an opinion in public. You can bet that Michaelle Jean wouldn't be able to voice an opinion on Canada's Poet Laureate's work. (I thought of your country because you posted the pic of HM as queen of Canada, not the U.K.)
I wonder if the Poet Laureate is allowed to resign, or if the appointment is for life.
Huntington Sharp, Red Room
Queen and Country
Good - dare one say sharp - eyes.
In Canada the Poet Laureate is for a fixed time, so they do not become a fixture.
The Poet Laureateship is for
The Poet Laureateship is for life, Huntington. The office can, of course, be refused, though it's considered churlish to do so. I believe Sir Walter Scott was one notable decliner.
For Life
Rosy, I got so curious about poets laureate that I went over to Wikipedia and looked it up. (Hey, I think I could stretch it to being work-related.) The article there says Andrew Motion only took it for a ten-year term starting in 1999. If it's so deleterious to his writing, I guess he's glad he did. With lifespans the way they are today, a lifetime appointment doesn't make much sense.
Did you know San Francisco also appoints one, and that a former holder of the office is one your co-authors here?
Also, Ivory wrote a hilarious short-story about a crazy young woman who kills the (now former) U.S. poet laureate, Robert Pinsky. I hope it gets published one day. She brought down the house when she read it at Litquake a couple of years ago.
And that's what I know about poets laureate. The End. :)
Huntington Sharp, Red Room