where the writers are
SO,THIS GUY GUTENBERG DECIDED TO SHAKE UP THE PUBLISHING INDUSTRY, AND . . .
bibliomaniac
$12.95
Paperback

 The first printed books came with a question: What do you do with these things?

By Tom Scocca  

 

In the beginning, before there was such a thing as a Gutenberg Bible, Johannes Gutenberg laid out his rows of metal type and brushed them with ink and, using the mechanism that would change the world, produced an ordinary little schoolbook. It was probably an edition of a fourth-century grammar text by Aelius Donatus, some 28 pages long. Only a few fragments of the printed sheets survive, because no one thought the book was worth keeping.

“Now had he kept to that, doing grammars...it probably would all have been well,” said Andrew Pettegree, a professor of modern history at the University of St. Andrews and author of “The Book in the Renaissance,” the story of the birth of print. Instead, Gutenberg was bent on making a grand statement, an edition of Scripture that would cost half as much as a house and would live through the ages. “And it was a towering success, as a cultural artifact, but it was horribly expensive,” Pettegree said. In the end, struggling for capital to support the Bible project, Gutenberg was forced out of his own print shop by his business partner, Johann Fust.

Inventing the printing press was not the same thing as inventing the publishing business. Technologically, craftsmen were ready to follow Gutenberg’s example, opening presses across Europe. But they could only guess at what to print, and the public saw no particular need to buy books. The books they knew, manuscript texts, were valuable items and were copied to order. The habit of spending money to read something a printer had decided to publish was an alien one.

Nor was print clearly destined to replace manuscript, from the point of view of the book owners of the day. A few fussy color-printing experiments aside, the new books were monochrome, dull in comparison to illuminated manuscripts. Many books left blank spaces for adding hand decoration, and collectors frequently bound printed pages together with manuscript ones.

“It’s a great mistake to think of an absolute disjunction between a manuscript world of the Middle Ages and a print world of the 16th century,” Pettegree said.

As in our own Internet era, culture and commerce went through upheaval as Europe tried to figure out what to make of the new medium and its possibilities. Should it serve to spread familiar Latin texts, or to promote new ideas, written in the vernacular? Was print a vessel for great and serious works, or for quick and sloppy ones? As with the iPad (or the Newton before it), who would want to buy a printed book, and why?

(more)http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/08/29/cover_story/?page=full

Comments
1 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

Hi Dale: I'm so glad you

Hi Dale:

I'm so glad you bring up this matter of the history of technology. I allocate quite a bit to this concept in "The Opus of Amateur Radio Knowledge and Lore."

An excerpt:

Like all other innovations, radio was an answer looking for a question. Most of us have heard the saying, “Necessity is the Mother of Invention,” and taken it at face value. Even the most glancing inspection of the history of technology will show us that this saying is unmitigated B.S. (Buffalo Sausage). Discovery has always preceded application. The historical fact is that radio was around long before anyone could think of anything useful to do with it. This really bothers a lot of people for some reason...especially those who have never discovered anything.