where the writers are
MUCH ADO ABOUT BLOGGING
bibliomaniac
$14.95
Paperback
Oh happy Pie!

Normally I'm not prompted much by blog suggestions, but I just read, "What would Shakespeare blog?" That instantly got me to thinking is the question as if Shakespeare were alive now or as if he were blogging on June 8th, 1601?

If he were alive now, would he get so wrapped up in technology that he'd be writing film scripts and writing on a laptop between meetings? Maybe he'd feel as I'm feeling with my cell phone ringing and Facebook friends dashing notes about the pies they just ate and email scammers trying to get me to send them five thousand dollars to get their fortunes in Afghanistan: it's too much. Novelist Jonathan Franzen superglued his laptop's ethernet shut, and maybe Shakespeare, reading about that on a blog, would do the same thing.

But no, he's blogging, so his ethernet is fine. Thus instead of writing the next important something, he's distracted as I am now.

Films being the popular medium of our day, he'd be a screenwriter and he might be trying to get Ron Howard to consider a film on Ronald Reagan, showing the man as president when the Iran Contra scandal was at its peak and a third of all Americans wanted him out of office. The bard would show the ironies of the man,  popularized as a Federal Government Shrinker, but who increased spending 2.5% a year and exploded the national debt from 700 billion to nearly three trillion, making us think that fewer taxes on the rich means money would trickle down to the middle-class. We're still waiting for that rain.

Or would, say, a Fairy Godmother show up in 1601 with an iPad, explain it all, and let Shakespeare write to Red Room in the future?

Let's go with the latter, as it'll let me get into his mindset of June 1601. He may have still been polishing Hamlet then, so mortality was high on his mind, even though he was thirty-seven years old.  His father, John, would die later that year in September, and Dad was 70--very old for those days. John Shakespeare might have been getting quite frail. That might have put mortality on William's mind.

William had also been married eighteen years at that point, and his oldest daughter, Susana, had turned eighteen the month before. Younger daughter Judith was sixteen, her twin, Hamnet, having died five years earlier. That death, combined with hundreds of people still dying weekly from the bubonic plague in London, might have kept mortality on his mind.

His Globe Theatre, built two years earlier, was going strong, and Richard II had premiered a few months before. Queen Elizabeth was still in power after the Earl of Essex, one of her favorite people, had tried to seize control months earlier. She signed his death warrant, and it took three strokes of the executioner's axe to cut off his head.

Shakespeare also wrote the poem "The Phoenix and the Turtle" that year, which is about death of an ideal love. It includes the following lines:

Here the anthem doth commence:
Love and constancy is dead;
Phoenix and the turtle fled
In a mutual flame from hence.

So he'd definitely be blogging about mortality. Maybe he wouldn't blog. Maybe he'd put something on Facebook:

Just ate a pie, a blackberry pie.
Oh happy fruit of rust
With my teeth, thy crust
Let me die.

Comments
6 Comment count
Comment Bubble Tip

money to blog

the small money theaters drove writers, so he would likely blog as long as he had the funds to wrote now part of it is  to blog. in other words the bard worked as long as he had last nights returns.

Comment Bubble Tip

MTV

Chris, for some reason your note reminded me of the song "Money for Nothing."

I was just reading Broadway pulled in its largest haul for a season ever, and more tickets were sold this year than last, so four hundred and ten years later, theatre is hanging in there. "The Book of Mormon" is this year's most popular musical. Maybe Shakespeare would still be in the biz, writing musicals.

Comment Bubble Tip

in my blogs i copied a nty's piece

somewhere in my blogs i talked about this and i copied a nyts piece, basically you need a big motivation to write like that, and few have that combination of umph and plus never mind that lameness;;;

Comment Bubble Tip

her is the nyts reference

Literary Talent and the Market

February 14, 2011

* OPINION | February 15, 2011 Op-Ed Contributors: Would the Bard Have Survived the Web? By SCOTT TUROW, PAUL AIKEN and JAMES SHAPIRO Literary and creative talents often remain undeveloped unless markets reward them. "Copyright, now powerfully linking authors, the printing press (and later technologies) and the market, would prove to be one of history’s great public ...

Comment Bubble Tip

Making a living creates vibrant works

Chris, I found the link to the snipet you dropped in. The article, "Would the Bard Have Survived the Internet?" is at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/opinion/15turow.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

It's an interesting piece, linking commerce to free expression and vital new works. The article's authors wonder if the copyright laws are not enforced with the Internet, will music, theatre, film, and books diminish? Probably.

I happened to leave the theatre because, after having three plays produced, I learned it's so hard getting second productions and more. British playwrights are supported well, so much of our great theatre comes from England. (My play "Who Lives?" had a great second production two years ago, though, and a third may be coming up in Portland.)

If movie piracy gets so bad, then no one will want to invest millions of dollars to make films. Of course, we're a long way from that, but the article is saying that once Shakespeare and his contemporaries were able to earn money writing plays, more plays were written. Our artists and writers help advance culture, so don't let copyrights get compromised.

Comment Bubble Tip

impressive

you have impressive experiences and it does sadden me that there is not more formal support for authentic, serious artists, everyone lubs em but nobody wantsta pay. I have this incredible friend who is a known musician and he receives very few royalties despite being in the music business for 40 years. Its just heartbreaking. My fantasy is that 1% of any creative work would indefnately remain with the creator. And thus they would always have a means to profit at least partially from their work. An artist should never have to sign over rights entirely. A total surrender; and also should have some legal way to keep a relationship with their work and to benefit from their originality. I would call it the 1% law.