"Where did cafe culture go?" asks Leah McLaren of Canada's national paper, the Globe and Mail. Out the door with free wireless she claims.
In her column, McLaren tells the story of Zoots cafe in Toronto. Trying to lure customers, the cafe owners offered free wireless. And customers came, but they never left. They turned the cafe into an office away from the office and tables into virtual study carrels. "Ostensibly," writes McLauren echoing something a I say in my book, cafes are "public spaces, but they feel [like the] private sector."
But this was also something of business problem.
"As more people plugged in, the energy of the cafe began to sink," reported Zoots owner, Melanie Jainsse, "People would turn up, buy a $2 tea, hunker down, and sit there for five or six hours not buying anything or talking to anyone. It really started to buy me."
So Janisse covered up the plugs with duct tape.
At first, customers hated the change. They wanted their wireless. But eventually, Janisse claims, the cafe became more vibrant and even busier. "We're packed all the time now," she says, "People take the board games out of drawers, they play chess, they write in notebooks. They talk about art, it's great. I'm providing an environment for people who to breather air, not a haven for some jerk in skinny jeans who wants to slouch over his e-mail all day."
At some level, I'm down with Janisse. Wireless helps cafe customers to create their private spaces within the coffee shop, and they do, it seems, sometime get in the way of talk. They sometimes make cafes feel like study halls; you feel guilt if you talk out loud.
But there maybe Janisse is missing something, alternative forms of community. Certainly twitter and facebook and even e-mails are the basis for other kinds of talk and exchange and much of this takes shapes in the coffeehouse.
But the question is, I guess, what kind of talk matters the most? Does talk -- the kind of talk that nurtures community and connections and perhaps even democracy (nod to Habermas here and to the Penny Universities of England) -- need to be face to face? Is this the most important talk, the most essential to community? Isn't this the kind of talk that leads to other kinds of talk and can go in all kinds of directions?
Is twitter talk or facebook talk somehow less talk than face-to-face talk? Is it just a prelude to face-to-face talk in person, perhaps a wireless, free coffee shop? What kind of talk matters? And where is the coffeehouse is this process? Can it do both, be a place for real talk and virtual talk? Any thoughts?
About Bryant
Connections
View all »






I think it can be both...
I often get writing done at my local Peet's, plus I catch up on emails, facebook. I also try to meet friends there as well, to make sure I keep it equal.
Jennifer Gibbons, Red Room
I recently switched cafes,
I recently switched cafes, taking my $2+ business ($4+, if Adele is with me)two blocks down the street because the old place was your traditional gray-bearded-guys-yelling-about-how-george-bush-blew-up-the-twin-towers place and the new place is more your young-people-typing-(or-talking-but-more-quietly-and-it's-FRENCH-(quelle charmant!)-into-their-machines place, so it's easier to write. Plus, the new place has just upgraded to a dark Italian roast espresso(25 cents extra), so it's taste competitive with the old place now.
Contextual effects / the revolution will be tweeted [not]
In Keith Hampton and Neeti Gupta's study on Community and social interaction in the wireless city: wi-fi use in public and semi-public spaces (New Media & Society, Vol. 10, No. 6, 831-850, 2008), they talk about contextual effects, and how the context - such as the proportion of those practicing public privatism in a cafe through their engrossing use of a laptop computer - affects the sociality of a space:
"The same [contextual] effect applies to the likelihood of serendipity and other encounters in public spaces; it takes at least two for interaction, and if no one else is interested or available, ultimately you will remain alone. The higher the number of people engrossed in public privatism within any space, the less opportunity for new tie formation."
As for the online vs. offline talk - or the former leading to the latter (or, even better, online talk leading offline action) - I see both positive and negative examples. For a positively inspiring collection of vignettes illustrating how Twitter connections can affect offline interactions, I recommend Twittertales. For a negative, but largely misinterpreted (and overhyped) example, I recommend The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted Because Only 0.027% of Iranians Are on Twitter
Contextual Effects
Thanks so much Joe. This is a really interesting point. Perhaps it is not wifi itself, but the amount of wifi in a coffee shop that shapes the conversation or the possibility of conversation. And maybe the space matters as well. Too many small round tables will create too much cocooning in public. Maybe cafe owners committed to the coffeehouse ideal have to keep this in mind. Maybe more communal library tables, maybe more large round tables will do the trick. The thing to get people sitting together -- this fosters conversation and the conversation could be about what blogs or newspapers they are reading.